How Apple's Strengths Became Its AI Weakness
Sign up for ARPU: Stay ahead of the curve on tech business trends.
Apple, the world's most valuable technology company, is struggling to deliver on its ambitious artificial intelligence promises. With its stock lagging behind Magnificent 7 peers and investors growing anxious ahead of its annual developer conference, the company’s challenges in upgrading its legacy voice assistant, Siri, have come into sharp focus. According to former employees interviewed by the Financial Times, attempts to integrate cutting-edge large language models have been plagued by bugs. This struggle is more than a simple product delay; it's a case study in the innovator's dilemma, where the very strengths that built an empire—a mature product, a massive user base, and a strong privacy ethos—are becoming hurdles in the race to adapt to a new technological paradigm.
What is wrong with Apple's AI and Siri?
Apple's core AI problem lies in its attempt to incrementally upgrade Siri, a product baked into hundreds of millions of devices, rather than starting from a clean slate. Former executives have described this as trying to "climb the hill" instead of rebuilding from the ground up, a process that has proved technically challenging and buggy. This stands in stark contrast to competitors like OpenAI, who built their sophisticated voice assistants on new, generative AI-native foundations. The result has been a significant delay in the release of key "Apple Intelligence" features promised last year, with CEO Tim Cook recently admitting the technology did not meet the company’s “high quality bar” and was taking longer than expected.
Why is an established leader like Apple falling behind?
Apple's predicament is a textbook example of the innovator's dilemma. The company's historic success is built on a tightly integrated ecosystem of hardware and software that prioritizes user privacy and security, with a strong emphasis on on-device processing. While these have been powerful competitive advantages, they are at odds with the current generative AI boom, which is led by companies that favor powerful, data-hungry models running in the cloud. Apple's commitment to running AI features on-device adds a layer of complexity that slows development, while its competitors have been able to move faster with less constrained, cloud-based architectures. This strategic inertia, combined with what former employees described as fragmented leadership and initial reluctance to budget for a massive AI build-out, has left the company playing catch-up.
How are competitors taking advantage of Apple's position?
While Apple wrestles with its legacy systems, its rivals are aggressively pushing ahead. Voice assistants from OpenAI and Google are now widely seen as more capable and conversational than Siri. The performance gap became so apparent that Apple took a significant strategic step: partnering with its rival OpenAI to have ChatGPT handle queries that Apple Intelligence and Siri cannot. This reliance on a third-party for core AI capabilities is a major concession for a company that prides itself on controlling its entire technology stack. Meanwhile, other rivals are also seizing the opportunity. OpenAI, in a direct challenge to Apple’s hardware dominance, recently announced a $6.5 billion deal to acquire the startup of legendary ex-Apple designer Jony Ive, with the explicit goal of creating a new generation of AI-native hardware.
Why is a modern AI assistant so critical for Apple's future?
The race for AI supremacy is not just about smarter chatbots; it's about building the next major computing platform. The industry is moving toward "agentic" AI, where assistants can do more than just answer questions—they can take complex, multi-step actions on a user's behalf across different applications. A truly modern Siri is seen as critical to unlocking these agent-like abilities on the iPhone. Failure to deliver a competitive AI agent risks making the iPhone's interface feel dated and less useful than rival platforms. Apple's own services chief, Eddy Cue, acknowledged this threat in recent court testimony, stating, "You may not need an iPhone 10 years from now as crazy as that sounds... AI is a new technology shift, and it’s creating new opportunities for new entrants."
What external pressures are compounding Apple's AI challenges?
Apple's internal AI struggles are being exacerbated by a uniquely challenging external environment. The company is facing the direct impact of President Trump's tariffs on its hardware business, which relies heavily on a global supply chain. In China, its second-largest market, Apple is facing intense competition from local rivals like Huawei and has reportedly run into regulatory hurdles with its AI plans, which involve using models from Chinese companies like Alibaba. Simultaneously, its high-margin services business is under legal and regulatory pressure globally, threatening a key source of revenue and profit that could otherwise fund its massive AI investments. This combination of internal strategic challenges and external economic and political pressures creates a difficult path forward as Apple tries to prove to investors it can still lead in the age of AI.
Reference Shelf: