The Friendly Fire Trade War

TSMC Enforces a Non-Compete

The basic premise of United States industrial policy right now is that semiconductor manufacturing is a matter of national security. The government has poured billions into subsidies—and, under recent administration moves, even taken an equity stake—to ensure that Intel can build leading-edge chips on American soil. The theory is that relying on an island in the South China Sea for the world's most critical component is a geopolitical risk the U.S. can no longer afford.

But there is a slight complication with the "national security" argument: Taiwan has read the same memos. And it turns out, Taiwan also views semiconductor manufacturing as a matter of national security—specifically, its national security.

This collision of interests resulted in a remarkable scene in Taipei this week. Taiwanese investigators raided the home of Wei-Jen Lo, a 75-year-old engineer and former Senior Vice President at TSMC. They seized computers, froze his real estate assets, and launched a criminal probe under the National Security Act.

His alleged crime? Taking a job at Intel, and allegedly packing TSMC's "secret sauce" in his carry-on. Here's Bloomberg:

When Intel hired septuagenarian Lo Wei-jen in October, a few months after his retirement from TSMC, few might have expected that to disturb the delicate balance between two of the world’s major chipmakers...

Local prosecutors searched Lo's residences in Taiwan and seized his assets on suspicion that he could have breached the island's national security law, which includes provisions against leaking of advanced technologies to foreign firms and countries.

The geopolitical twist here is that the law in question is mostly aimed at China, which is pursuing its own world-class chip industry while vowing to one day take over Taiwan, by force if necessary. The use of such measures with respect to the US, Taiwan's biggest ally in defense and beyond, shows Taipei's determination to protect its most sensitive proprietary data.

Lo is a legend in the industry. He spent 18 years at Intel during its golden era, then 21 years at TSMC, where he led the "Nighthawk Project"—a round-the-clock R&D effort that helped TSMC overtake Intel in process technology. Now, Intel has hired him back to help reverse that defeat.

To Intel, this is just "healthy talent movement." To Taipei, it looks a lot like industrial espionage. TSMC alleges there is a "high probability" Lo leaked trade secrets. The prosecutors are treating a job change like a defection.

This creates a layer of irony that is almost too thick to cut. The United States government is effectively paying Intel to rebuild the domestic chip industry, and the Taiwanese government—a stalwart U.S. ally—is raiding the homes of the people Intel hires to do it.

The dispute highlights the bizarre reality of the Chip War. Usually, we think of this war as the U.S. versus China, with export controls and sanctions. But the battle for the actual talent—the "wizards" who know how to tune an EUV machine to get a 3nm yield—is increasingly a zero-sum game between allies.

Intel is in a desperate turnaround mode. It has the factories (or is building them), and it has the government cash. But silicon manufacturing is an art as much as a science; you cannot just buy the equipment from ASML and expect it to work. You need the people who know the recipes. Intel needs Lo's brain to fix its foundry business.

TSMC, however, understands that its geopolitical relevance—its "Silicon Shield"—relies on being the only company in the world that can do what it does. If Intel catches up, Taiwan becomes slightly less indispensable to the American economy. And so, a 75-year-old engineer moving back to his old employer isn't treated as a retirement gig; it is treated as a breach of national security.

The market usually assumes that technology transfers happen via patents or corporate acquisitions. But in the semiconductor industry, the most valuable IP walks out the door on two legs. The U.S. wants that IP back. Taiwan is willing to freeze bank accounts to keep it. It turns out that "friend-shoring" is a lot harder when your friends want to keep the good stuff for themselves.

More on Semiconductor:

• Marvell to buy chip startup Celestial AI for $3.25 billion (Reuters)
• Google's TPU and the New Economics of AI Deployment (ARPU)

On Our Radar

Our Intelligence Desk connects the dots across functions—from GTM to Operations—and delivers intelligence tailored for specific roles. Learn more about our bespoke streams.

The Nvidia Alliance

• The Headline: Amazon's AWS will integrate Nvidia's NVLink technology into its future custom AI chips and is launching new servers powered by its current-generation Trainium3 chip. (Reuters)
• ARPU's Take: This is a pragmatic surrender to reality by Amazon. Despite spending billions on its own custom AI chips to compete with Nvidia, it is now adopting Nvidia's proprietary interconnect technology. It's a clear signal that Nvidia's ecosystem has become so dominant that even its largest competitors have to build with it, not just against it.
• The Product Question: This partnership effectively ends the debate over whether a single company can build a completely proprietary, end-to-end AI hardware stack. For product leaders across the tech industry, this establishes that interoperability with Nvidia's platform is a baseline requirement for market relevance. The new strategic imperative is to design products that can seamlessly integrate into the Nvidia ecosystem, as attempting to build a completely separate alternative is now a competitively unviable strategy.

The Multicloud Bridge

• The Headline: Amazon's AWS and Google Cloud have jointly launched a new service that enables customers to create private, high-speed network links between their two platforms, a move designed to improve reliability and simplify multi-cloud deployments. (Reuters)
• ARPU's Take: This is a stunning "frenemy" move, directly driven by overwhelming customer demand for resilience after the recent major AWS outage. Amazon is pragmatically sacrificing its walled garden purity to solve a real customer problem, while Google gets a high-speed on-ramp to AWS's massive customer base.
• The Operations Question: This partnership creates a "fast lane" between the #1 and #3 cloud providers, effectively squeezing Microsoft Azure. By standardizing high-speed data transfer between AWS and GCP, they reduce the technical friction of a "multi-cloud minus Azure" strategy. This encourages large enterprises to split workloads between AWS and Google for redundancy without suffering latency penalties, potentially eroding Azure's market share as the "default secondary cloud."

P.S. Tracking these kinds of complex, cross-functional signals is what we do. If you have a specific intelligence challenge that goes beyond the headlines, get in touch to design your custom intelligence.

You received this message because you are subscribed to ARPU newsletter. If a friend forwarded you this message, sign up here to get it in your inbox.