Google Faces Billions in Losses if DOJ Antitrust Case Succeeds
Sign up for ARPU: Stay ahead of the curve on tech news.
The Department of Justice’s (DOJ) antitrust lawsuit against Google could cost the tech giant hundreds of billions of dollars, according to a Yahoo Finance analysis. This potential loss extends far beyond Google's core search business, significantly impacting revenue streams from Android, Chrome, and YouTube. The stakes are high, not just for Google, but for the broader tech landscape.
The DOJ's case, initially filed under the Trump administration and continued under President Biden, centers on Google's alleged anti-competitive practices in search. The August ruling by Judge Amit Mehta, which found Google illegally monopolized the search market, marked a significant victory for the DOJ. This ruling, however, is subject to appeal by Google. The judge has set a two-week hearing in April 2025 to determine remedies. A final ruling is expected by August 2025.
The core of the DOJ's argument is Google's dominance as the default search engine on numerous devices. Alexis Keenan, Yahoo Finance’s senior legal reporter, estimates that losing default search status could cost Google $175 billion annually — 67% of its 2023 revenue. This is a far more aggressive attempt to rein in a tech giant than the unsuccessful attempt to break up Microsoft two decades ago.
Beyond Search: The Chrome and Android Question
The potential damage extends beyond search. The DOJ is seeking to force Google to divest its Chrome browser and Android operating system. Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Mandeep Singh values Chrome at $15-$20 billion, highlighting its pivotal role in Google’s ad business. Chrome’s vast user base allows Google to effectively target advertising. Furthermore, Google leverages Chrome to direct users to its AI product, Gemini.
While the DOJ initially considered forcing the divestiture of Android, this has been scaled back, according to sources familiar with the matter. This suggests a more nuanced approach by the DOJ in seeking to reshape the market rather than fully dismantling Google's operations.
The potential sale of Chrome presents significant challenges. Bob O’Donnell of TECHnalysis Research suggested to Bloomberg that Chrome's value isn't solely derived from direct revenue but from its role as a gateway to other Google services. Finding a buyer capable of maintaining Chrome's reach and integrating it effectively into their own ecosystem is a crucial consideration. Speculative potential buyers include OpenAI and other US based AI companies, which might be more favorably viewed by regulators than other large tech companies already facing antitrust scrutiny. Google itself has argued that other owners wouldn't invest as heavily in Chrome or keep it free, potentially disrupting the current business model and hurting consumers.
The Ripple Effect
The DOJ’s proposed remedies extend to data licensing requirements, aimed at fostering competition and transparency in Google's AI development and search results. Google's use of search data to power AI products is currently under scrutiny, with websites complaining of reduced traffic due to AI Overviews which frequently show answers without clicks through to the source site.
The proposed changes could also impact smaller competitors like Brave and Microsoft’s Bing, potentially pushing them out of the market if Google is forced to share data and license its search results, as one Brave executive voiced concerns about to Ms. Keenan.
The Advertising Empire: Another Front
Adding another layer of complexity is the separate DOJ antitrust case focusing on Google's dominance in online advertising technology. This case, concluding with closing arguments in November 2024, alleges that Google monopolized ad tech markets. If found liable, Google could be forced to divest Google Ad Manager, further impacting its revenue streams. Analysts view this case as a smaller financial risk than the search-related case, but its outcome will still have considerable consequences. Publishers like News Corp have testified about their inability to switch from Google's ad platform due to the extensive reach and scale of Google's ad network.